High heat temperatures are continuing throughout California. Please read our previous eBlast discussing California’s high heat illness prevention standard and steps that employers must take to protect outdoor workers from potential heat illness here. Many areas throughout California have already reached or exceeded 80 degrees, which trigger an employer’s obligation to comply with California Heat Illness Prevention guidelines.

Today, Cal/OSHA issued a news release urging all employers to protect outdoor workers from heat illness. The news release is available here. Several cities across the state are already dealing with high heat temperatures and it is expected to stay between 90 and 100 degrees for the next few weeks, which triggers an employer’s obligation to comply with California Heat Illness Prevention guidelines. With temperatures on the rise throughout California, this is an important time for employers to re-evaluate their company’s Heat Illness Prevention guidelines and ensure that their policies are updated and compliant.

High heat temperatures have officially arrived throughout California. As a result, Cal/OSHA published a news release reminding all employers to protect their outdoor workers from heat illness. The press release is available here. Many areas throughout California have already reached triple digits, which trigger an employer’s obligation to comply with California Heat Illness Prevention guidelines.

On Tuesday, the Department of Industrial Relations published a news release announcing that the Division of Occupational Safety and Health of California (“Cal/OSHA”) cited marine cargo handler SSA Pacific Inc. for willful and serious safety violations after the investigation of a fatal forklift accident in San Diego. According to the news release, an employee was driving a forklift when he collided with a concrete column and suffered fatal injuries after being thrown from the forklift while not wearing a seatbelt. Additionally, the investigation revealed that multiple safety devices on the forklift had been disabled, including the seatbelt warning buzzer and the mast interlock system that should disconnect power from the hydraulic lift when the operator is not in the seat.

Last week, a California Appeals Court answered a narrow question as to whether the interior of a non-air-conditioned bus can be deemed an “outdoor place of employment” for the purposes of the California’s heat illness prevention regulations. The Appeals Court, which agreed with the decision of the lower court, held that, “outdoor” is defined as ‘out of doors’ or ‘not in a building" and that if “an enclosure or structure does not provide sufficient environmental protections to be considered ‘indoor’ then it is ‘outdoor.’”

As most employers know, under California Code of Regulation, title 8, section 3395, employers with outdoor places of employment are required to put in writing and implement an effective heat illness prevention plan, which includes, but is not limited to, procedures for providing sufficient water, access to shade, and high-heat. In November 2007, Cal OSHA cited AC Transit, which operates buses throughout Alameda County and adjoining areas, for violation of heat illness prevention laws with respect to the operation of non-air-conditioned buses for (1) failure to supply adequate drinking water to drivers; (2) failure to make shade continuously available for drivers; and (3) failure to develop heat illness procedures and related training for employees and supervisors. During relevant timeframes, AC Transit employed between 1,200 and 1,900 drivers and operated 695 buses, only 20 percent of which were air-conditioned.

In 2016, when the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) issued its “Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses” rule that required certain employers to submit injury/illness data electronically, employers in state-plan states like California were not required to comply until their states issued their own rules. California employers covered by Cal/OSHA were not yet subject to this rule, as we reported here, until now.

Built For Employers